An irrational inequality (or equation) of the “shortcut” type appears very often when a geometric distance condition is translated into formulae. Let us look at a typical example that we shall meet again in the chapter on pencils of lines.
Example — Find the lines through at a fixed distance from
Determine the lines through that are at distance from the point .
Set-up. A line through has equation , that is, in implicit form . The distance of from it is:
Equation. becomes
We are in a “shortcut” case: left-hand side , right-hand side a positive multiple of , both . We square directly without sign-splitting (the makes the absolute value disappear):
The excluded case: the vertical line. The parametrisation does not include the vertical lines. Let us check separately: the line is at distance from , and , so it is not a solution.
Solution: there are exactly two lines, .
Remark — Why we did not need to split
Had we ignored the structure and treated as “a root to isolate”, we would have added the conditions (always true) and (always true). Neither of these restricts the domain: it is recognising the structure “both sides always ” that tells us, even before calculating, that such conditions will be useless.
Links
Topics: Irrational inequalities
Concepts: Irrational inequality · Point–line distance · Pencil of lines · Line · Absolute value
Methods: Squaring · Non-negative sides shortcut
Skills: Analytic geometry · Using formulae