When two absolute values appear in an inequality, of the form and , we cannot apply the schemes for a single absolute value: we need either a case analysis on the signs of the two arguments, or an algebraic trick.
The “squaring” algebraic trick. When both sides are absolute values, (or ), squaring preserves the direction, because both are : the inequality is equivalent to , that is , which is studied with the sign table. The idea of the “square as a shortcut for getting rid of the absolute value” is one of the basic heuristics discussed by Esty.
Property — Casework for and
- (the two absolute values coincide if the arguments are equal or opposite);
- ;
- .
Example —
Equivalent to :
- ;
- .
Solution: .
Example — by squaring
. Using the difference of squares: that is . Solution: .
Case discussion on the signs. When the squaring trick does not apply (for example with constant), one fills in the sign table of and : each region singles out a “without absolute values” version of the inequality.
Example —
Study of the signs: changes sign at ; changes sign at . Three regions:
- (): (compatible);
- (): , false, no solution;
- (both ): (compatible).
Solution: .
Geometric interpretation: is the sum of the distances of from the points and on the real line. Since between and the distance is , the sum equals when lies outside the interval , at a distance : we obtain or .
Example —
Sign table of and :
- : , that is ;
- : , always true, the whole of ;
- : , that is .
Union: .
In summary — "Mixed cases" decision table
Form of the inequality Recommended method squaring sign table of and replace with (scheme ) with arbitrary casework on the sign of (special cases 1 and 2)
Links
Topics: Parabola
Concepts: Absolute value inequalities · Distance on the line · Line · Sign table · Absolute value
Methods: Absolute value mixed cases
Skills: Reasoning by cases · Solving inequalities